6月13日的雅思考试也结束啦！6月10日上海环球教育徐祎娇老师公开课上有类似命中了本次考题！大家快快关注起来吧~

　　话不多说，我们来看一下这一次由上海环球教育余曰简老师带来的雅思写作范文解析~

　　06-13  观点类 - 环保话题

　　Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

　　题目大意：

　　个人无力改善环境。只有政府和大公司可以做到。同意或反对？

　　思路：

　　任务回应：

　　题目观点由2部分组成，需全部回应：1）个人无力改善环境；2）环保只能靠政府和企业。

　　论证逻辑：

　　文章中遇到带有武断含义的词要留意，Only是强调排他性的武断表达，如果选择同意，很难证明（即很难从逻辑推导出政府和企业和环保之间的唯一性，也很难用2个以上的成功案例来证明这是一个普遍的事实），所以这道题目建议选择完全反对。即主体段-1：写个人完全可以有所作为来改善环境；主体段-2：反驳“只有政府企业能改善环境”这个武断的概念（即光靠他们这种理论说不通）。

　　提纲梳理如下：

　　范文

　　Some people assert that there is no justification for individuals in tackling environmental problems,whereas it is the business exclusive to authorities and companies. I completely disagree with this opinion as I do not see any fields that can be isolated from the general public.

　　From an individual perspective, there are many things they can do to reduce their contribute to environmental pollution. One option is that residents can reduce the emissions of the carbon dioxide by driving less and traveling more by public transport.The effect has been approved in many metropolitan cities like Shanghai, where convenient and affordable public transport services have played an importantrole in the reduction of exhaust fumes from vehicles. Another practical action that can be taken by individuals is to classify rubbish, which can make a huge difference in recycling waste.

　　In addition, it looks absurd to me that environmental issues are reckoned to be only addressed by politicians and business moguls. While some might argue that it is the administration that has the power to legislate against pollution, we should not forget that many bills are initiated under the influence of the public opinion. One convincing example is the decision of Brexit based on the referendum of British citizens. Also,industrial pollution should not be the only culprit to blame. One striking fact we cannot afford to ignore is the enormous amount of daily rubbish from households, such as the plastic bags and packages. How can we focus only on enterprises while turning a blind eye on household waste?

　　In conclusion, I do not think the problem of pollution could be addressed by authorities and large companies without the involvement of individuals.

　　相关词汇：

　　Exclusive  仅限于

　　Authority  政府

　　Isolate  隔绝

　　carbon dioxide 二氧化碳

　　metropolitan  大都市

　　affordable  负担得起的

　　exhaust fumes  排放

　　moguls  巨头

　　the administration 政府

　　legislate  立法

　　initiate  发起

　　referendum  公投

　　culprit  罪魁祸首

　　相关句型：

　　It looks absurd to methat …

　　While some might arguethat …, we should not forget …

　　It is the administration that has the power to …

　　One convincing exampleis …

　　One striking fact wecannot afford to ignore is …

　　How can we focus onlyon… while turning a blind eye on … ?